• Log In
  • Log In
Science Leadership Academy @ Center City
Science Leadership Academy @ Center City Learn · Create · Lead
  • Students
    • Mission and Vision
  • Parents
  • Community
    • Mission and Vision
  • Calendar

American Government - Laufenberg Public Feed for tag DADT

Create a Post

Lobbying Against "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"

Posted by Taylor Valentine in American Government - Laufenberg on Thursday, January 13, 2011 at 8:26 pm

​

Blog Post #5


For Blog #1, click here
For Blog #2, click here
For Blog #3, click here 
For Blog #4, click here

On December 18th, Congress finally passed the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal, a process that has taken many months to complete.  Democrats overcame the omnipresent threat of Republican filibuster and passed the bill by a vote of 65-31.  Eight Republicans voted “Aye,” including Richard Burr (NC), who although not in favor of the timing, believed that “this policy is outdated and repeal is inevitable.”  The repeal also marked an historic day for President Obama, who ran under the promise of repeal.
Burr
Burr
​In the press conference before signing the bill into law, he stated, “With any change there is some apprehension.  That’s natural. But as Commander-in-Chief, I am certain that we can affect this transition in a way that only strengthens our military readiness.“  Now that Congress has fulfilled its duty, it is time to initiate the next steps.  However, the attitude among many is “Now what? We’ve repeal the discriminatory policy, but how can we even begin to change it?”

The answer seems to still be unclear even for the Department of Defense, who claim to be working as diligently, yet as quickly as possible.  Sec. Robert M. Gates explained the process that the military plans to follow.  “I see this as a three-step process. The first is to finalize changes in regulations [and] policies [and] get clearer definition on benefits. The second phase is to prepare training materials for use by personnel specialists, chaplains, commanders and other leaders, and those who are in daily contact with service members. My hope is that [this] can be done within a matter of a very few weeks, so that we can then move on to what is the real challenge, which is providing training to 2.2 million people.”

Regardless of how long this process takes, there are still provisions in the legislation that requires a 60-day waiting period, even after the plan is approved by Gates, Obama and Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mike Mullen, before the law is no longer in effect.  Contrary to popular belief, “now is not the time to ‘come out,’” Mullen recently stated.

The main issue is actually acceptance.  If every soldier was content with serving alongside a homosexual, there would be no need to retrain our military.  What the Department of Defense needs to focus on is adopting a more accepting nature within the military and surrounding it.  Since the birth of this country, military service was allotted to the “strong, masculine, courageous” patriot.  However, this has slowly changed with the inclusion of women and soon, of homosexuals.  We are no longer in colonial times, and as a country we need to realize this.  Our military is only as strong as the average Americans’ support behind it.  More than those actually fighting, it is the citizens at home who need to be trained.  

On January 8th, I tuned into iPower 92.1, a radio station in Richmond, VA, as the host discussed “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and the public’s response to it.  I listened as people ranted about Christianity’s intolerance of homosexuals and condemned our country for allowing them to serve.  One caller claimed that forcing heterosexuals to serve alongside homosexuals denied them of their own rights.  “What if they are uncomfortable with it?” he asked.  

I later called in with one answer.  “As members of the military, it is their job to protect this country, regardless about how they feel about those serving alongside them.  There are simply more important issues.  I know that I am not brave or patriotic enough to risk my life , and I will always be indebted to anyone who is.  Gay or straight, male or female.”  To the religious callers, I referenced the Constitution, which established the separation of church and state.  “Quite simply, religion can not and should not impede our safety.”  

As I wrap up my blogging, I want to end by quoting President Obama at the signing.  “We are not a nation that says, ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell.’  We are a nation that says, ‘Out of many, one.’” The repeal has been passed and it is only a matter of time before homosexuals are legally permitted in the military.  My only hope is that soon, they will be accepted into it as well.
gayflag
gayflag
Tags: DADT, politics, Lobbying
Be the first to comment.

Lobbying Against "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"

Posted by Taylor Valentine in American Government - Laufenberg on Thursday, December 9, 2010 at 7:40 pm

Blog Post #4

For Blog #1, click here
For Blog #2, click here
For Blog #3, click here

A lobbyist can spend months researching the issues they feel strongly about, and weeks researching the representatives that can make a difference, but until he or she gets involved, their actions are useless. 

 During the last week, I’ve attempted to make my own voice heard in the mess that is the current “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” repeal attempt.  As I have made calls and written emails, I have realized that gaining recognition from large organizations and politicians is much more difficult than the democratic ideal would have you believe.  

I began the process by contacting Equality Forum, which, according to my research, had yet to take a strong stance and make its voice heard on  DADT.  I sent the following email to Chip Alfred, Equality Forum's Communication Director:

Dear Mr. Alfred,

My name is Taylor Valentine and I am a senior at Science Leadership Academy in Philadelphia.  I am currently working on an American Government lobbying project focused on repealing the Pentagon’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy.  I’ve spent months following the news, researching the issues and learning about my representatives.  I am now tasked with actively getting involved.  

I recently discovered Equality Forum and realized it has yet to make its voice heard on DADT.  With the number and willpower of your members, a rally, petition or joint-letter could foster public awareness and garner massive media attention on the issue.  The American public is not against repeal, they are simply unconscious of the current effort to allow it.  Any action involving Equality Forum would have a critical impact on Senators Bob Casey and Arlen Specter, encouraging them to proactively seek repeal.     

As you may know, time is of the essence.  The end of Congress’ lame-duck session will mark the end of the possibility for repealing this blatantly discriminatory law.  I hope to hear from you soon and look forward to any future collaborative effort on this issue. 

Sincerely,

Taylor Valentine    

While I hoped to receive information detailing ways the organization planned to get involved and ways I could help, instead I received a rather brusque response.  Mr. Alfred informed me that they had, in fact, taken a stand and discussed it at their annual Equality Forum, which took place in May.  After digging through the website, I finally found a reference to the panel he mentioned. Honestly, I was disappointed in the lack of recent action.  As the largest LGBT issue debated in recent years on the federal level, it should warrant a more public response.  I then replied, asking how I could get involved. I’m still waiting on a response.

Next, I focused my attention to those with the most direct influence on the success of the repeal: my senators.  I drafted a very pointed email for Senator Specter, only to find that his contact page had been shut down since he will relinquish his post in January. When I called his Philadelphia office, I left a message with a secretary, who thanked me for my comment.  Although it was satisfying to voice my concern to an actual human being instead of a computer, I doubt my comments will go much further than the notepad they were recorded on. 

I then directed my email to Senator Casey, who will continue after the lame-duck session ends:

Dear Senator Casey,

I am writing in regards to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and the current attempt being made to repeal it.  It appalls me that such a blatantly discriminatory piece of legislation has withstood 17 years of criticism and remains in place today.  This is not the example that should be set in a country of such high moral character.  

Furthermore, “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” has impeded our military process. In a time when our troops are deployed around the world in attempts to protect our own freedoms and those of others, what benefit can be found in discharging able and willing troops? Will it improve military readiness and cohesion, a claim that so many senators have made?  The Pentagon’s study found that it would not.  Will it improve the public opinion of America’s military? Absolutely not.  In fact, polls have shown the opposite. So I ask you Senator, why have you allowed this policy to continue?

I ask not only for your vote, which I know you’ve already pledged, but your voice as well.  In order to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” Republicans must be convinced that it is the morally appropriate and necessary decision to make.  I do not need to remind you that time is of the essence.  If next year’s Defense Appropriation bill does not pass with language allowing repeal, you will have failed your fellow Americans, who only wish to serve with the same dignity and respect that all other troops are granted.  This is not too much to ask.

Sincerely,

Taylor Valentine 

I am waiting for a response from his office, hoping that it will be more than a generic “Thank you”.  I’ve realized that it is almost impossible for one citizens to make an impact without the help of others. In the coming weeks, I plan to gather support and send more emails and phones calls to my senators.  I also hope to start a Facebook page about DADT, encouraging others to get involved as well.

Tags: Lobbying, DADT
Be the first to comment.

Lobbying Against "Don't Ask Don't Tell"

Posted by Taylor Valentine in American Government - Laufenberg on Wednesday, November 17, 2010 at 4:05 pm

DADT Blog #2

For Blog #1, click here
For Blog #3, click here 
For Blog #4, click here
1WwQgA-_DRHWDYEnrY1v71hE4Hf1D1g
1WwQgA-_DRHWDYEnrY1v71hE4Hf1D1g

As a Pennsylvanian residing in the 2nd district, I am represented by three democratic congressmen: Rep. Chaka Fattah, Sen. Arlen Spector and Sen. Robert P. Casey.  Although each often votes with the party, some are more liberal than others.  In lobbying against such a debatable issue, one must look past the facade often created by politicians and find the real person underneath.   

Chaka_Fattah_official_House_photo
Chaka_Fattah_official_House_photo

Rep. Chaka Fattah has served in various parts of the government for 28 years.  After attending both the University of Pennsylvania and Harvard University’s Kenneday School of Government, Fattah was elected to the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and then to the State Senate.  He has spent the last 16 years serving Pennsylvania’s 2nd district in the House of Representatives.  

He is in full support of repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” stating last year that “Our nation’s core principles, as well as an overwhelming majority of the American people, support full and equal rights for all our citizens...For far too long the law, and administrative practice, have discriminated against LGBT Americans, and it is way past the time to end this discrimination.” He helped pass the House bill that would’ve allowed DADT to be repealed, had it not been filibustered in the Senate.

Last week, Judge Virginia Phillips of the District Court of California, after ruling that DADT was unconstitutional, ordered an injunction against the military’s policy.  Although the Obama administration is seeking a repeal, Rep. Fattah strongly supports it: “The ruling stands on sound Constitutional grounds, citing free speech and due process violations by the government in barring openly gay and lesbian members from the armed services. She also cites the need to end ‘Don’t Ask Don’t Tell’ as a critical step toward improving military morale, readiness and recruiting at a time when our men and women in uniform are fighting distant battles.” Rep. Chaka Fattah, while up for reelection next month, will most certainly continue to be an ally in the fight against DADT. 

specter-705065
specter-705065

Sen. Arlen Spector is less reliable as a liberal voter.  A Republican for the vast majority of his political career, Sen. Spector changed parties last year in hopes of reelection.  However, his voting record does not suggest a Democratic ideology.  In 1996, he voted to prohibit same-sex marriage and in 2002 to exclude sexual orientation in the definition of a hate crime.  Despite renouncing his previous position on many civil rights issues, Pennsylvanians did not buy his claim and he lost the primary to Joe Sestak, a legislator strongly in favor of gay rights.

It seems that the truth behind Sen. Spector’s political beliefs will be revealed during the Senate’s lame duck session, when ousted congressmen are no longer accountable to their constituents. He currently serves on the Committees of Appropriations and of the Judiciary, focusing on civil rights.   He has voted for some gay rights in the past, but for the former Air Force officer and Warren Commission member, a repeal of DADT is not a sure deal.

us-senator-bob-casey
us-senator-bob-casey

Sen. Robert P. Casey Jr. has served in the Senate since 2007.  His primary goal is the welfare of the American people, focusing on issues such as the economy, the environment and healthcare.  He is in strong support of a repeal, stating "As we continue to fight two wars, our national security depends on a strong and talented military.  And ending this discriminatory practice is the right thing to do for our military and for those who want to openly serve their country.” Although he does differ in his opinions on same-sex marriage, he is steadfast in his belief on “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” After the November elections, Sen. Casey will become Pennsylvania’s senior senator.

There are currently are multitude of organizations supporting gay rights in this country.  However, one of particular interest is the Log Cabin Republicans, which initiated the current injunction against DADT by filing a lawsuit against the U.S. military.  The organization fights to ensure that the voice of the gay and lesbian community is heard in a party where is it typically ignored and that equality drives its action.  LCR has worked from the inside to prevent the passage of the Federal Marriage Amendment and other anti-gay legislation.  Despite the conservatism of their party, this group is fighting for the equality that all people deserve.

Tags: DADT, politics, Lobbying
Be the first to comment.

Lobbying Against "Don't Ask Don't Tell"

Posted by Taylor Valentine in American Government - Laufenberg on Wednesday, November 17, 2010 at 3:57 pm

DADT Blog #1

For Blog #2, click here
For Blog #3, click here
For Blog #4, click here
Screen shot 2010-10-06 at 6.51.51 PM
Screen shot 2010-10-06 at 6.51.51 PM

The current opinion on homosexuality in the military is very clear: it is unwelcome.  This law, commonly referred to as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) was enacted in 1993 by President Bill Clinton in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1994 (P.L. 130-160 H.R. 2401).  It stated that if a service member is found to be homosexual, he or she will be immediately discharged.  The service member can be probed about his or her sexual orientation if an officer has a reason to question his or her heterosexuality.  However, as long as it is kept hidden, homosexuals can remain in the military.  

During this project, my partner and I will be lobbying to    have this policy repealed.  It is blatant discrimination and homophobia, which should not be tolerated by the U.S. government.  The men and women who serve this country should not be forced to hid pieces of their identities for fear of being discharged.  President Obama’s promise to repeal this policy has further sparked my interest in it and increased my hope of success.  

Earlier this year, Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-CT) proposed legislation that would repeal DADT, stating on his website “To exclude one group of Americans from serving in the armed forces is contrary to our fundamental principles as outlined in the Declaration of Independence and weakens our defenses by denying our military the service of a large group of Americans who can help our cause.” Unfortunately, the Defence Authorization Bill for 2011, which included this repeal, was filibustered by Republicans on September 21st.  Sen. Lieberman has made it clear that he will revisit the legislation after this year’s elections.  

Many Democrats support the repeal, including Ms. Ellen Tauscher, who previously served as a House representative from California and was recently appointed to Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security.  She proposed similar legislation last year, but failed to make gains on the issue.  

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz) is leading the opposition.  Currently, McCain only opposes the bill so long as the Pentagon does.  “It is a blatant message of disrespect to our men and women in uniform that Congress is unwilling to even wait to hear what the force has to say on this important matter before pushing ahead with a controversial, political vote two months before an election.”  The Pentagon has launched a study on whether the repeal would have a negative effect on military readiness.  An affirmative result would be a victory for Republicans who argue that repealing “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” would diminish military cohesiveness and discipline.  

However, the future does hold promise.  The younger generation is more heavily in support of repealing the 17 year old policy.  According to a poll conducted by Angus Reid Public Opinion, almost 60% of Americans would like to see DADT overturned.  Even more influential, the Federal District Court of California ruled that DADT violates 1st and 5th Amendment rights.  This ruling is seen by many proponents as a catalyst for change.  Hopefully, they are right.  

Tags: Lobbying, DADT, politics
Be the first to comment.
RSS

AMGOV-001

Term
2010-11

Blog Tags

  • American Government 9
  • Lobbying 6
  • benchmark 5
  • sla 5
  • Laufenberg 5
See all See less
  • politics
  • DADT
  • Cassise
  • Chris
  • AM GOV
  • Bureaucracy
  • Johnny D.
  • Carousel
  • Q1 BM
  • UFOs
  • Sky Kalfus
  • Volstead Act
  • 12th grade
  • blog
  • Hyde Amendment
  • AMGOV
  • Lauf
  • government functions
  • green card
  • Am govt
  • Q2
  • 2nd quarter

Teacher

  • Diana Laufenberg
Science Leadership Academy @ Center City · Location: 1482 Green St · Shipping: 550 N. Broad St Suite 202 · Philadelphia, PA 19130 · (215) 400-7830 (phone)
×

Log In